For today's #HistFicThursdays blog, I am thrilled to be welcoming Rosemary Griggs to the blog with a guest post about her latest book Mistress of Dartington Hall , as part of her Coffee Pot Book Club tour! Read on to find out about her strong female character in what is largely thought of as a male world. But first, let's meet the book... Blurb 1587. England is at war with Spain. The people of Devon wait in terror for King Philip of Spain’s mighty armada to unleash untold devastation on their land. Roberda, daughter of a French Huguenot leader, has been managing the Dartington estate in her estranged husband Gawen’s absence. She has gained the respect of the staff and tenants who now look to her to lead them through these dark times. Gawen’s unexpected return from Ireland, where he has been serving Queen Elizabeth, throws her world into turmoil. He joins the men of the west country, including his cousin, Sir Walter Raleigh, and his friend Sir F...
With global events reaching a boiling point, I've been thinking quite a lot about what makes a hero or heroine. Because it's an historical fiction blog, that's what I'm focussing on, but I'm pretty sure these thoughts can pass over onto other genres too.
The first thing is that the hero/ine does not have to be the main character. Tolkien said that Samwise Gamgee was the real hero of The Lord of the Rings (which can hardly come as a shock to anyone who has read it) but he was not the main - or even the second - character. If you are writing with an ensemble cast, this is a more obvious distinction. Chances are, if you have only one major character, they are also going to be the hero/ine.
Next, consider that a hero/ine does not have to be right the whole time. The important thing about their decisions is twofold:
- They always do what they believe to be best for other people
- They always work (and hopefully achieve!) to put right any harm their choices have made
These two factors must go hand-in-hand. Without the second one you could potentially have (at best) an antihero or (at worse) a psychotic lunatic. Without the first you just end up with a character who is constantly a little bit preachy as they go around mopping up other people's mess.
Throughout history there have been some fantastic examples of hero/ines. But a word of warning! If you choose to write about one of them, remember they are probably someone else's hero/ine and they might have very different ideas about how that person would have responded to whatever situation you put them in. This can cause a reader who might have really enjoyed every other aspect of your book to grow unsatisfied with it. I'm not saying you should never write about real heroes or heroines, but that you should be prepared for the readers' response!!!
But, I suppose the most important thing of all, is that a hero/ine - a true hero/ine - puts themselves after the wellbeing of others. It would be untrue to say that they never think of themselves, but they have to prioritise others. There will be slip-ups, there can be massive flaws, and they should never be perfect. But they have to be the next best thing!
Finally, remember that those people who you find heroic are not necessarily the same as other people's. They might not agree with you, but that is the reader's right. I don't hold with "the author is dead", but just bear in mind that - in order to produce your best work - you will be writing for yourself as much as anyone else.
Comments
Post a Comment